Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 16:08:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 16:08:42 -0400 Received: from relay.snowman.net ([63.80.4.38]:58116 "EHLO relay.snowman.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 16:08:40 -0400 From: nick@snowman.net Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 16:14:10 -0400 (EDT) To: "David S. Miller" cc: linux_learning@yahoo.co.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: this code does not get called in dev.c so do we need it? In-Reply-To: <20021002.171042.42890215.davem@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1049 Lines: 28 I'm not sure if this is a dumb question, but why arn't there any in-tree drivers with support for this? Is it too ugly to merge? Nick On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, David S. Miller wrote: > > Fast routing, although not implemented in any in-tree drivers, > does get used by some people who have hacked up drivers to support > this. > > It allows IPv4 routing to occur right at the level of the device > driver, it directly pushes an input packet to the output routine > of the destination device all without leaving the driver. > > This code is used. > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/