Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755159Ab3FLGFq (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jun 2013 02:05:46 -0400 Received: from mail-oa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.219.42]:52685 "EHLO mail-oa0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752763Ab3FLGFo (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jun 2013 02:05:44 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20130612080002.3f382ee1@amdc308.digital.local> References: <1370502472-7249-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <1370941408-29304-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <20130612080002.3f382ee1@amdc308.digital.local> Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:35:44 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] cpufreq:boost: CPU Boost mode support From: Viresh Kumar To: Lukasz Majewski Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocky" , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , Linux PM list , Vincent Guittot , Jonghwa Lee , Myungjoo Ham , linux-kernel , Lukasz Majewski , Andre Przywara , Daniel Lezcano , Kukjin Kim Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 795 Lines: 19 On 12 June 2013 11:30, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > As you pointed out in the other mail 1/3 has its own issues, but I > think that patches 2/3 and 3/3 are an integral part of the boost > support and bring better overall overview to the design. Yes they are. Undoubtedly. >> Maybe you can just send v3 of 1/3. 2/3 and 3/3 can be sent when we >> have finalized 2/3 and 3/3 's version. > > I'd opt for sending the whole patchset (it shouldn't be so difficult to > adjust those patches), since it is easier for me to test. Okay. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/