Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261384AbSJCW1q>; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 18:27:46 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S261387AbSJCW1q>; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 18:27:46 -0400
Received: from 12-231-242-11.client.attbi.com ([12.231.242.11]:24589 "HELO
	kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S261384AbSJCW1p>;
	Thu, 3 Oct 2002 18:27:45 -0400
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:30:28 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: jbradford@dial.pipex.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (WAS Re: [PATCH-RFC] 4 of 4 - New problem
Message-ID: <20021003223028.GB2221@kroah.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210030852330.2066-100000@home.transmeta.com> <200210031616.g93GGAjO000918@darkstar.example.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200210031616.g93GGAjO000918@darkstar.example.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 580
Lines: 26

On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 05:16:10PM +0100, jbradford@dial.pipex.com wrote:
> 
> Hmmm, then for 3.0 I'd vote for fully working and proven stable:

Hm, how do you "prove" any of these are stable :)

> * Bluetooth

Been there since 2.4

> * USB (2)

Present in 2.5 (and 2.4 now too)

> * IEEE 1394

Been there since 2.4.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/