Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756524Ab3FLKek (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jun 2013 06:34:40 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:7731 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752343Ab3FLKei (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jun 2013 06:34:38 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,851,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="315802774" Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:24:43 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Linus Walleij Cc: Wei Yongjun , Srinidhi KASAGAR , Dan Williams , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Wei Yongjun , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2] dmaengine: ste_dma40: fix error return code in d40_probe() Message-ID: <20130612095443.GU4107@intel.com> References: <20130530173326.GD3767@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1607 Lines: 41 On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 11:14:16AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:41:38AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Wei Yongjun wrote: > >> > >> > From: Wei Yongjun > >> > > >> > In many of the error handling case, the return value 'ret' not set > >> > and 0 will be return from d40_probe() even if error, but we should > >> > return a negative error code instead in those error handling case. > >> > This patch fixed them, and also removed useless variable 'err'. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun > >> > --- > >> > v1 -> v2: rebased on linux-next.git > >> > >> I've tentatively applied this to my dma40 branch, waiting for Vinod > >> to ACK it. > > I though you wanted me to apply this :) > > > > Nevertheless, Acked-by: Vinod Koul > > > > Can you CC stable too, pls. > > Hm I'm not sending any DMA40 stuff for stable, sorry ... > if you want it to go into stable you'd better pick this > (the v3 version) into the DMA tree. okay > > Let me know how you want it, I've removed it from my > dma40 branch for the time being. Have you removed, Also I see a v3 of this, do you want to ack that before I apply -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/