Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 18:53:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 18:53:11 -0400 Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk ([130.88.200.93]:5129 "EHLO serenity.mcc.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 18:53:10 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 23:58:42 +0100 From: John Levon To: kernel Cc: rml@tech9.net, davej@codemonkey.org.uk, torvalds@transmeta.com Subject: Re: export of sys_call_table Message-ID: <20021003225842.GA79989@compsoc.man.ac.uk> References: <20021003153943.E22418@openss7.org> <20021003221525.GA2221@kroah.com> <20021003222716.GB14919@suse.de> <1033684027.1247.43.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1033684027.1247.43.camel@phantasy> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i X-Url: http://www.movementarian.org/ X-Record: Mr. Scruff - Trouser Jazz Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 949 Lines: 29 On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 06:27:06PM -0400, Robert Love wrote: > > Hmm, I guess this means oprofile has no chance of working > > on Red Hat's kernels ? Bummer. > > Newer oprofile does not need the exported syscall table. Right. Assuming Linus is interested in merging the patch. I've yet to see any kind of comment from him. > I believe Red Hat 8.0 even ships with oprofile :) Sort of. They've broken IA64 oprofile, and they seem not to care. I'm pretty disgusted Arjan sent this patch without even the courtesy of a Cc: to lkml (apologies if I just missed it). regards john -- "Me and my friends are so smart, we invented this new kind of art: Post-modernist throwing darts" - the Moldy Peaches - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/