Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:27:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:27:21 -0400 Received: from noodles.codemonkey.org.uk ([213.152.47.19]:54941 "EHLO noodles.internal") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:27:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 00:35:04 +0100 From: Dave Jones To: Robert Love Cc: Greg KH , kernel Subject: Re: export of sys_call_table Message-ID: <20021003233504.GA20570@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Robert Love , Greg KH , kernel References: <20021003153943.E22418@openss7.org> <20021003221525.GA2221@kroah.com> <20021003222716.GB14919@suse.de> <1033684027.1247.43.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1033684027.1247.43.camel@phantasy> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 822 Lines: 24 On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 06:27:06PM -0400, Robert Love wrote: > > Hmm, I guess this means oprofile has no chance of working > > on Red Hat's kernels ? Bummer. > Newer oprofile does not need the exported syscall table. Hrmmm, HEAD CVS from a few minutes ago still does. John's work on getting things done correctly for 2.6 doesn't change the fact that it's buggered on Red Hat's 2.4 kernel. Or does it ? > I believe Red Hat 8.0 even ships with oprofile :) Interesting. Maybe I'll download a copy sometime 8) Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/