Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 20:27:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 20:27:07 -0400 Received: from 2-225.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.193.160.225]:21165 "EHLO 2-225.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 20:27:04 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 21:32:17 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Greg Ungerer cc: Christoph Hellwig , Alan Cox , Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.40-ac1 In-Reply-To: <3D9CD647.7000806@snapgear.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1005 Lines: 35 On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Greg Ungerer wrote: > Rik van Riel wrote: > Easy done. Would it bother anyone having a few files > named XYZ-nommu.c in there? Excellent. > Although the sticking point may be the common files that > still contain a lot of ifdefs. That's ok initially. We can probably split up functions somewhat or do other tricks to reduce the number of ifdefs later on. Alternatively, we could do the splitting first and the nommu merge later. I don't really care about the order as long as things don't happen simultaneously in patch that's too big to check ;) regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Spamtraps of the month: september@surriel.com trac@trac.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/