Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758635Ab3FMKii (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jun 2013 06:38:38 -0400 Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:47060 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756141Ab3FMKih (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jun 2013 06:38:37 -0400 Message-ID: <51B9A11D.5070504@ti.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:38:21 +0300 From: Oleksandr Kozaruk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CC: Mark Brown , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [RFC v1] MFD: Change TWL6025 references to TWL6032 References: <1370602390-12306-1-git-send-email-oleksandr.kozaruk@ti.com> <20130607143649.GS31367@sirena.org.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.167.145.163] X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: f9c360f5-3d1e-4c3c-8703-f45bf52eff6b Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1740 Lines: 40 On 06/07/2013 05:44 PM, gg@slimlogic.co.uk wrote: > On 2013-06-07 15:36, Mark Brown wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:53:10PM +0300, Oleksandr Kozaruk wrote: >>> From: Graeme Gregory >>> >>> The TWL6025 was never released beyond sample form and was replaced by >>> the PhoenixLite range of chips - TWL6032. Change the references to >>> reference the TWL6032 class and name the registers to twl6032 in >>> line with >>> an actual released chip name to avoid confusion. >>> >>> Currently there is no users of TWL6025 in the code. >> >> Given that the chip exists even if not widely distributed it seems as >> well to keep the twl6025 references in there at least in the device ID >> table - it won't do any harm to people using the twl6032 name and might >> help someone who happens to pick up an old board for whatever reason. > > I do not think any "old boards" exist, it really was a limited run! > > Graeme > Hello Mark, Graeme, Taking in account that: - there is no hardware to test twl6025, testing is not possible; - there is no documentation for twl6025, and if there are any changes to twl6032 is not known; - twl6032 is available, and in production, twl6025 is not even found on ti.com So, what do you think, can this change be accepted? // I apologize for sending previous email as personal, not to mail list. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/