Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 16:15:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 16:15:35 -0500 Received: from [63.109.193.245] ([63.109.193.245]:38128 "EHLO ninigret.metatel.office") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 16:15:23 -0500 Message-Id: <200012292045.PAA17190@ninigret.metatel.office> From: Rafal Boni To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: 2.2.19pre3 and poor reponse to RT-scheduled processes? X-Mailer: NMH 1.0 / EXMH 2.1.1 Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 15:45:23 -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii [...Please CC me on any replies, as I'm not on the list(s)...] Folks: I was experiencing problems with 2.2.16 where the box would go out to lunch for a few seconds flushing buffer or paging at inopportune times (is there ever an opportune time for the box to become non- reponsive for 5 seconds? 8-). 2.2.19pre3 makes the behaviour much better, but I still see ~ 2sec pauses at times. I'm sending this to the MM list as well, since I believe the poor behaviour in 2.2.16 was an MM issue... I don't know where the slowdowns are happening this time around. The box in question is running the linux-ha.org heartbeat package, which is a RT-scheduled, mlock()'ed process, and as such should get as good service as the box is able to mange. Often, under high disk (and/or MM) loads, the box becomes unreponsive for a period of time from ~ 1 sec to a high of ~ 2.8sec. The test is simply running a 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/u1/big-empty-file bs=1k count=512000 && date'. Generally, the box will sieze up around the same time as the the 'dd' finishes (maybe trying to exec date?). I'd appreciate any hints at how to reduce the non-reponsiveness window down as much as possible. I haven't yet looked to see if there is a version of the low-latency patches for 2.2.18 or 19pre, but I'd appreciate other ideas on tracking this down as well. Thanks! - --rafal - ---- Rafal Boni rafal.boni@eDial.com PGP key C7D3024C, print EA49 160D F5E4 C46A 9E91 524E 11E0 7133 C7D3 024C Need to get a hold of me? http://800.eDial.com/rafal.boni@eDial.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 iD8DBQE6TPfjEeBxM8fTAkwRAiPaAKDSp1udFSypqq838fwAjQnlFW0m2wCgtycm xF7xuBroSl3YXCTqUXGDAy0= =JHLL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/