Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758888Ab3FMWiq (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jun 2013 18:38:46 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:33660 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757849Ab3FMWin (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jun 2013 18:38:43 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:38:41 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Stratos Karafotis Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Borislav Petkov , Viresh Kumar , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] cpufreq: ondemand: Change the calculation of target frequency Message-ID: <20130613223841.GF32112@pd.tnic> References: <7661669.NhG4BEI8zO@vostro.rjw.lan> <51B64BC6.6040400@semaphore.gr> <16929930.1G36b4NkSe@vostro.rjw.lan> <51BA380A.1040009@semaphore.gr> <20130613214007.GA32127@pd.tnic> <51BA41E9.8020004@semaphore.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51BA41E9.8020004@semaphore.gr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 697 Lines: 19 On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 01:04:25AM +0300, Stratos Karafotis wrote: > I believe that ondemand has better performance with this patch in > medium loads. Maybe these operations produce small to medium loads > (lower than up_threshold) and push the CPU to medium frequencies. > Without the patch CPU stays longer to min frequency. Yep, this is my impression too. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/