Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 10:35:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 10:35:14 -0400 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16]:19452 "EHLO pat.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 10:35:13 -0400 To: Jan Harkes Cc: David Howells , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] AFS filesystem for Linux (2/2) References: <20021003165304.GA25718@ravel.coda.cs.cmu.edu> <15381.1033681790@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <20021004140229.GA11066@ravel.coda.cs.cmu.edu> From: Trond Myklebust Date: 04 Oct 2002 16:40:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20021004140229.GA11066@ravel.coda.cs.cmu.edu> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 754 Lines: 15 >>>>> " " == Jan Harkes writes: >> Besides, I get the impression that NFSv4 may require some level >> of kerberos support in the kernel. > If not kerberos, at least some for of encryption. IP/Sec would > need the same things. NFSv4 does indeed require the full kerberos encryption stuff in the kernel. The RFC specifies that krb5 support is a minimum requirement, and we will expect to have that in 2.6 (or 3.0 or whatever it's called these days...) Cheers, Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/