Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754948Ab3FPFkI (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Jun 2013 01:40:08 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:33020 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754111Ab3FPFkG (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Jun 2013 01:40:06 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: Linda Walsh , Linux-Kernel Cc: "ACPI Devel Maling List" , Subject: Re: mod filenames != modnames? (inconsistent name changing) In-Reply-To: <51B7BD57.7050406@tlinx.org> References: <51B7BD57.7050406@tlinx.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+81~gd2c8818 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 15:05:29 +0930 Message-ID: <87bo76r526.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1745 Lines: 50 Linda Walsh writes: > Should we have any expectation that a module name and it's filename > should be equivalent? > > I was writing an auto-complete script for modprobe so it wouldn't give > me the option to double load a module (I'd have to manually type it in if > I really wanted it). > > Trouble is some modules with names w/underscores ('_') change > register their names with a 'dash'. But modprobe kvm_intel already works. Just convert any - to _? > Would it be too much trouble to ask that the same names be used in > both places? Well, you could get kernel developers to rename their files with underscores. I've CC'd them. We use _ because we turn the module names into identifiers; it's also the most common choice, and having both is just confusing. > I have about 30 modules loaded now and out of that list, > 2 are name changes: > > acpi_cpufreq (filename acip-cpufreq.ko) > kvm_intel (filename kvm-intel.ko) > > If I load a bunch more... I find more that change names. > > Could the naming in the modules that do this be made consistent? > > Not doing so makes automatically tying a mod-name to it's file > tend toward being non-deterministic. > > Many modules use '-' or '_' without being confused. > It would be helpful if the few confused modules could > get their identity straight. Is there a problem with > making these names consistent? It shouldn't break anything to rename them, if there's consensus I'm happy to create a patch. Cheers, Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/