Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 11:28:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 11:28:48 -0400 Received: from mail.parknet.co.jp ([210.134.213.6]:57352 "EHLO mail.parknet.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 11:28:47 -0400 To: "Randy.Dunlap" Cc: Scott Bronson , Subject: Re: FAT/VFAT and the sync flag References: From: OGAWA Hirofumi Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 00:33:50 +0900 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <87d6qq1an5.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 977 Lines: 20 "Randy.Dunlap" writes: > On 3 Oct 2002, Scott Bronson wrote: > > | Can anyone tell me if the VFAT filesystem actually recognizes the sync > | flag? Early in 2.4, it appeared that it was ignoring it. > | > | However, now that a lot of USB devices are VFAT, this gets pretty > | important. > > Now, for you first question, I hope that Ogawa or Al or Christoph > et al can answer it, but my guess is, No, VFAT doesn't > recognize the sync flag. I base that on grepping for > s_sync and for MS_SYNCHRONOUS in linux/fs/{fat,vfat,msdos} > and finding s_sync a few times, but not finding MS_SYNCHRONOUS > at all. You are right. The fatfs just ignore the sync flag. -- OGAWA Hirofumi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/