Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756191Ab3FQJjD (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jun 2013 05:39:03 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:38569 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755983Ab3FQJjB (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jun 2013 05:39:01 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:38:38 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Alex Shi Cc: mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, bp@alien8.de, pjt@google.com, namhyung@kernel.org, efault@gmx.de, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de, riel@redhat.com, wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Jason Low , Changlong Xie , sgruszka@redhat.com, fweisbec@gmail.com Subject: Re: [patch v8 9/9] sched/tg: remove blocked_load_avg in balance Message-ID: <20130617093838.GN3204@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1370589652-24549-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> <1370589652-24549-10-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1370589652-24549-10-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2068 Lines: 52 On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 03:20:52PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote: > blocked_load_avg sometime is too heavy and far bigger than runnable load > avg, that make balance make wrong decision. So remove it. > > Changlong tested this patch, found ltp cgroup stress testing get better > performance: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/23/65 > --- > 3.10-rc1 patch1-7 patch1-8 > duration=764 duration=754 duration=750 > duration=764 duration=754 duration=751 > duration=763 duration=755 duration=751 > > duration means the seconds of testing cost. > --- > > And Jason also tested this patchset on his 8 sockets machine: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/29/673 > --- > When using a 3.10-rc2 tip kernel with patches 1-8, there was about a 40% > improvement in performance of the workload compared to when using the > vanilla 3.10-rc2 tip kernel with no patches. When using a 3.10-rc2 tip > kernel with just patches 1-7, the performance improvement of the > workload over the vanilla 3.10-rc2 tip kernel was about 25%. > --- > > Signed-off-by: Alex Shi > Tested-by: Changlong Xie > Tested-by: Jason Low > --- > kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c > index 3aa1dc0..985d47e 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c > @@ -1358,7 +1358,7 @@ static inline void __update_cfs_rq_tg_load_contrib(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, > struct task_group *tg = cfs_rq->tg; > s64 tg_contrib; > > - tg_contrib = cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg + cfs_rq->blocked_load_avg; > + tg_contrib = cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg; > tg_contrib -= cfs_rq->tg_load_contrib; > > if (force_update || abs64(tg_contrib) > cfs_rq->tg_load_contrib / 8) { PJT ping! ;-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/