Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 15:04:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 15:04:27 -0400 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:34706 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 15:04:27 -0400 Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 12:07:59 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" Reply-To: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Andrew Morton , Manfred Spraul cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] patch-slab-split-03-tail Message-ID: <1121907497.1033733278@[10.10.2.3]> In-Reply-To: <3D9DE69C.C6E88C9F@digeo.com> References: <3D9DE69C.C6E88C9F@digeo.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 758 Lines: 20 > Run that by me again? So we're saying "if we just freed an > object from this page then make this page be the *last* page > which is eligible for new allocations"? Under the assumption > that other objects in that same page are about to be freed > up as well? > > Makes sense. It would be nice to get this confirmed in > targetted testing ;) Just doing my normal boring kernel compile suggest Manfred's last big rollup performs exactly the same as without it. Not sure if that's any help or not .... M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/