Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754594Ab3FRI2N (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:28:13 -0400 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:52807 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753314Ab3FRI2J (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:28:09 -0400 Message-ID: <51C01A07.7030805@ti.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:57:51 +0530 From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Laxman Dewangan CC: "gg@slimlogic.co.uk" , Mark Brown , "lgirdwood@gmail.com" , "sameo@linux.intel.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "balbi@ti.com" , Keerthy Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] regulator: palmas: enable all modes for SMPS10 References: <20130604093816.GY31367@sirena.org.uk> <51ADB6BF.6020205@ti.com> <20130604100511.GA31367@sirena.org.uk> <51B5A14E.6000500@ti.com> <20130610100330.GO31367@sirena.org.uk> <51B5B268.8090908@ti.com> <20130610124924.GU31367@sirena.org.uk> <51B8345F.601@nvidia.com> <20130612141409.GE1403@sirena.org.uk> <20130612145126.GG1403@sirena.org.uk> <51BB0DC9.3090809@nvidia.com> In-Reply-To: <51BB0DC9.3090809@nvidia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1313 Lines: 34 Hi, On Friday 14 June 2013 06:04 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > On Wednesday 12 June 2013 08:53 PM, gg@slimlogic.co.uk wrote: >> On 2013-06-12 15:51, Mark Brown wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 03:31:09PM +0100, gg@slimlogic.co.uk wrote: >>>> On 2013-06-12 15:14, Mark Brown wrote: >>>>> Yes, that seems like the most obvious thing here as far as I can tell >>>> >from the frankly fragmented and obscure information but given all the >>>>> confusion that seems to exist among the people working on the driver >>>>> it's really not clear if there's something else going on. >>>> What about the case where they are inputs? For bus power? >>> So the current flow can change direction here? >> Just rechecked the data sheet and it looks like that use-case has >> actually been >> removed from more recent data sheets. >> >> So ignore me, yes now it can be modelled by two regulators! > > Thanks for concluding on this. > > Kishon, > Are you going to send new patch for splitting this regulator or should I > send for this? I'll send by today or tomorrow. Thanks Kishon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/