Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261769AbSJDU5m>; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:57:42 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S261785AbSJDU5m>; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:57:42 -0400
Received: from fed1mtao04.cox.net ([68.6.19.241]:44240 "EHLO
	fed1mtao04.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S261769AbSJDU5l>; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:57:41 -0400
Message-ID: <3D9E020E.9070703@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 14:03:10 -0700
From: "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming@cox.net>
Organization: Laboratory Systems Group, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20020924
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Any problems with 2.4 and gcc 3.2?
References: <20021004204851.26027.qmail@web40020.mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 609
Lines: 16

Brad Chapman wrote:
> I'm going to be installing RH8 soon, and would like to know if gcc 3.2
> miscompiles 2.4 kernel code (i.e. 2.4.20-pre8, for example). Are there any
> problems with the code that gcc 3.2 produces from kernel source?
> 
> Brad
> 

I have a system that's been running 2.4.20-preX compiled with GCC 3.2 
for over a month now, no problems so far.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/