Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:38:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:38:22 -0400 Received: from svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com ([24.136.46.5]:15889 "EHLO svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:38:16 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] patch-slab-split-03-tail From: Robert Love To: Manfred Spraul Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mbligh@aracnet.com In-Reply-To: <3D9E0760.8040507@colorfullife.com> References: <3D9E0760.8040507@colorfullife.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 04 Oct 2002 17:43:58 -0400 Message-Id: <1033767839.1247.107.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 547 Lines: 16 On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 17:25, Manfred Spraul wrote: > Which cpus have slow local_irq_disable() implementations? At least > for my Duron, this doesn't seem to be the case [~ 4 cpu cycles > for cli] I believe there are pipeline effects to disabling interrupts, e.g. it has to be flushed? Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/