Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:24:14 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com" <yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 2/3] tracing/kprobes: Kill probe_enable_lock
Message-ID: <20130618192414.GA19488@redhat.com>
References: <20130616172149.GA8540@redhat.com> <51BE97C0.1070203@hitachi.com> <20130617151841.GA32267@redhat.com> <51BFD6EF.1060805@hitachi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51BFD6EF.1060805@hitachi.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 612
Lines: 21

On 06/18, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> Oh, I agree with removing probe_enable_lock itself :)
> I just concerned only about the exceptional case of __init test
> function, which can mislead someone to use enable/disable_trace_probe
> at other racy point.

Ah, understand.

OK, I'll send v2 with the updated comments plus the additional patch
tomorrow.

Thanks!

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/