Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933864Ab3FSAwX (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:52:23 -0400 Received: from cobra.newdream.net ([66.33.216.30]:45209 "EHLO cobra.newdream.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933445Ab3FSAwW (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:52:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:52:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Sage Weil X-X-Sender: sage@cobra.newdream.net To: majianpeng cc: ceph-devel , linux-kernel Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] ceph: fix sleeping function called from invalid context. In-Reply-To: <201306190837590546663@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <201306181930448773810@gmail.com>, <201306190837590546663@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3920 Lines: 81 On Wed, 19 Jun 2013, majianpeng wrote: > >On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, majianpeng wrote: > >> [ 1121.231883] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rwsem.c:20 > >> [ 1121.231935] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 9831, name: mv > >> [ 1121.231971] 1 lock held by mv/9831: > >> [ 1121.231973] #0: (&(&ci->i_ceph_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at:[] ceph_getxattr+0x58/0x1d0 [ceph] > >> [ 1121.231998] CPU: 3 PID: 9831 Comm: mv Not tainted 3.10.0-rc6+ #215 > >> [ 1121.232000] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By > >> O.E.M./To be filled by O.E.M., BIOS 080015 11/09/2011 > >> [ 1121.232027] ffff88006d355a80 ffff880092f69ce0 ffffffff8168348c ffff880092f69cf8 > >> [ 1121.232045] ffffffff81070435 ffff88006d355a20 ffff880092f69d20 ffffffff816899ba > >> [ 1121.232052] 0000000300000004 ffff8800b76911d0 ffff88006d355a20 ffff880092f69d68 > >> [ 1121.232056] Call Trace: > >> [ 1121.232062] [] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b > >> [ 1121.232067] [] __might_sleep+0xe5/0x110 > >> [ 1121.232071] [] down_read+0x2a/0x98 > >> [ 1121.232080] [] ceph_vxattrcb_layout+0x60/0xf0 [ceph] > >> [ 1121.232088] [] ceph_getxattr+0x9f/0x1d0 [ceph] > >> [ 1121.232093] [] vfs_getxattr+0xa8/0xd0 > >> [ 1121.232097] [] getxattr+0xab/0x1c0 > >> [ 1121.232100] [] ? final_putname+0x22/0x50 > >> [ 1121.232104] [] ? kmem_cache_free+0xb0/0x260 > >> [ 1121.232107] [] ? final_putname+0x22/0x50 > >> [ 1121.232110] [] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 > >> [ 1121.232114] [] ? sysret_check+0x1b/0x56 > >> [ 1121.232120] [] SyS_fgetxattr+0x6c/0xc0 > >> [ 1121.232125] [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > >> [ 1121.232129] BUG: scheduling while atomic: mv/9831/0x10000002 > >> [ 1121.232154] 1 lock held by mv/9831: > >> [ 1121.232156] #0: (&(&ci->i_ceph_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: > >> [] ceph_getxattr+0x58/0x1d0 [ceph] > >> > >> I think move the ci->i_ceph_lock down is safe because we can't free > >> ceph_inode_info at there. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma > >> --- > >> fs/ceph/xattr.c | 4 ++-- > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/fs/ceph/xattr.c b/fs/ceph/xattr.c > >> index 9b6b2b6..4efde06 100644 > >> --- a/fs/ceph/xattr.c > >> +++ b/fs/ceph/xattr.c > >> @@ -675,7 +675,6 @@ ssize_t ceph_getxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name, void *value, > >> if (!ceph_is_valid_xattr(name)) > >> return -ENODATA; > >> > >> - spin_lock(&ci->i_ceph_lock); > >> dout("getxattr %p ver=%lld index_ver=%lld\n", inode, > >> ci->i_xattrs.version, ci->i_xattrs.index_version); > > > >Unfortunately these intervening lines neext i_ceph_lock to prevent the > >i_xattrs struct contents from shifting underneath us. It is more > IMHO,for those line > > vxattr = ceph_match_vxattr(inode, name); > > if (vxattr && !(vxattr->exists_cb && !vxattr->exists_cb(ci))) { > > err = vxattr->getxattr_cb(ci, value, size); > It's no need to protect by i_ceph_lock. > Can you expalin in detail? Oh! You're totally right. I got distracted by the dout() line that prints i_xattrs.* fields; *that* needs to move that too to stay inside the lock. Care to update the patch? Thanks! sage > >expensive for the general getxattr case, but a simpler fix is to take > >map_sem outside of i_ceph_lock. > [snip] > > > Thanks > Jianpeng Ma -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/