Message-id: <51C25F93.9050004@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:49:07 +0900
From: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510
 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-version: 1.0
To: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com>
Cc: "'Doug Anderson'" <dianders@chromium.org>,
        "'Jaehoon Chung'" <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
        "'Chris Ball'" <cjb@laptop.org>,
        "'Will Newton'" <will.newton@gmail.com>,
        "'Bing Zhao'" <bzhao@marvell.com>,
        "'Ashok Nagarajan'" <asnagarajan@chromium.org>,
        "'Paul Stewart'" <pstew@chromium.org>,
        "'Olof Johansson'" <olof@lixom.net>, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: mmc: dw_mmc: Always go to STATE_DATA_BUSY from
 STATE_DATA_ERROR
References: <1363382956-14557-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org>
 <5146EAB0.1030705@samsung.com>
 <CAD=FV=Ww-iK=-vg4jnJe6w4836-yQUoUyxNvCYsDQ5w0q-OMMQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <515E88E3.5070507@samsung.com>
 <003401ce3453$19d1e8c0$4d75ba40$%jun@samsung.com>
 <CAD=FV=V+ZZ0MUtuWKUOgR9NPyAquUjFC6KtHvAP-4iHXAYpjqA@mail.gmail.com>
 <001601ce35b9$652c5870$2f850950$%jun@samsung.com>
 <CAD=FV=XKeRjpH1+ytjMfLuGGqQ5VVub22n=V+UpV=jBCD4LLHw@mail.gmail.com>
 <001801ce6c20$6ba39900$42eacb00$%jun@samsung.com>
In-reply-to: <001801ce6c20$6ba39900$42eacb00$%jun@samsung.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
DLP-Filter: Pass
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1883
Lines: 54

Hi All,

I tested with Seungwon's patch and this patch.
I'm agreed with Seungwon's opinion.

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung

On 06/18/2013 09:36 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> On Thursday, June 13, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> Seungwon,
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com> wrote:
>>>>> There are two solutions we have applied.
>>>>
>>>> I'm a little confused.  Have you already applied one or both of the
>>>> solutions you list below, or are you proposing them as alternates to
>>>> the patch I submitted?
>>> Yes, first one already has been applied.
>>> I wanted to introduce our fix. Did you try to test with these fixes?
>>
>> I'm coming back to this after being quite distracted for a while.
>>
>> I'm a little confused in that you said that your first fix was already
>> applied.  I don't see it anywhere.  Did you mean that you've already
>> applied it locally, or that it's applied in some git tree somewhere?
>> If so, can you point me to it?
>>
>> If this hasn't been sent out anywhere, perhaps you could send out
>> official patches?
> Currently, it has just applied for some projects, not official patch.
>>
>> I don't have the failing unit myself, so we'll have to get Bing to try
>> the patches.  You are suggesting that we try applying both of your
>> patches, right?
> Did you test the patch?
> I wonder that both are good for your side.
> 
> Thanks,
> Seungwon Jeon
>>
>> -Doug
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/