Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 05:46:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 05:46:25 -0400 Received: from sj-msg-core-3.cisco.com ([171.70.157.152]:56734 "EHLO sj-msg-core-3.cisco.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 05:46:25 -0400 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021005194507.031018c0@mira-sjcm-3.cisco.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 19:49:29 +1000 To: Linus Torvalds From: Lincoln Dale Subject: Re: [PATCH] direct-IO API change Cc: Andrew Morton , Chuck Lever , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux NFS List In-Reply-To: References: <3D9E1847.F6DDA3AE@digeo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 865 Lines: 23 At 04:23 PM 4/10/2002 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: >Especially since I thought that O_DIRECT on the regular file (or block >device) performed about as well as raw does anyway these days? Or is that >just one of my LSD-induced flashbacks? from my multiple 64/66 PCI bus + multiple 2gbit/s FC HBA tests, yes, they're around the same. (now up to 390mbyte/sec throughput on latest & greatest x86 hardware i have; front-side-bus no longer the limiting factor, but dual 64/66 PCI). of course, purely synthetic tests designed to stress Fibre Channel switching infrastructure, not real-world disk i/o.. cheers, lincoln. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/