Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S262289AbSJEKV6>; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 06:21:58 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S262290AbSJEKV6>; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 06:21:58 -0400
Received: from smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.137]:2322 "EHLO
	smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S262289AbSJEKV6>; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 06:21:58 -0400
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 12:26:49 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
X-X-Sender: roman@serv
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
cc: gilbertd@treblig.org, <lm@work.bitmover.com>, <tom_gall@mac.com>,
       <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: New BK License Problem?
In-Reply-To: <20021004.170451.27090459.davem@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210051220300.338-100000@serv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 771
Lines: 23

Hi,

On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, David S. Miller wrote:

> It is very ontopic because it affects a number of kernel developers.

Does it? So far it was only a question and there are better places than
lkml to research it.

> Whether you like BK or not, it is the primary source management tool
> used by Linus and others, it is even documented in the source tree as
> such.

I don't care about bk and I wouldn't care about such questions either, if
Larry wouldn't use every such opportunity to publicly jerk off about bk.

bye, Roman

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/