Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S262310AbSJELtJ>; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 07:49:09 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S262315AbSJELtJ>; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 07:49:09 -0400
Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:60423 "EHLO
	www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S262310AbSJELtI>;
	Sat, 5 Oct 2002 07:49:08 -0400
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 12:54:43 +0100
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <gilbertd@treblig.org>
To: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New BK License Problem?
Message-ID: <20021005115443.GW710@gallifrey>
References: <AD47B5CD-D7DB-11D6-A2D4-0003939E069A@mac.com> <20021004140802.E24148@work.bitmover.com> <20021004.160216.58843127.davem@redhat.com> <20021004163335.A5336@work.bitmover.com> <20021005003840.GQ710@gallifrey> <20021004174501.Q835@work.bitmover.com> <20021005005344.GR710@gallifrey> <20021004180600.R835@work.bitmover.com> <20021005011706.GU710@gallifrey> <20021004185325.V835@work.bitmover.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20021004185325.V835@work.bitmover.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Chocolate: 70 percent or better cocoa solids preferably
X-Operating-System: Linux/2.4.18 (i686)
X-Uptime: 12:46:55 up 3 days, 14:13,  1 user,  load average: 0.20, 0.38, 0.18
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1740
Lines: 34

In private email with Larry I asked him to clarify the question to the
list; he didn't want to; but he did clarify to me the following and said
I could pass it on. Here is my understanding of what he said.

It really does appear that if you happen to be employed by a rival of
Larry's then you aren't allowed to use it, even to check out free
software unless you talk to Larry first.  He seems to be open to working
out exemptions/work arounds for particular organisations.

I was worried that this meant that some people didn't have access to
free software stored with bk; he pointed out that he has gone to great lengths 
to make the file formats fully compatible with SCCS (which answered my
question of why something in this day and age had messages about SCCS
appearing). So it should be possible to access the software using
software other than bitkeeper.

Now while I happen to not to like the idea of a license that restricts
usage based on who you happen to work for, my main fear (of people being
unable to get to hosted software) seems to be irrelevent due to this
SCCS compatibility.  So how does one use SCCS/CSSC to get the bk kernel
repositories?

That is my last message on this subject.

Dave
 ---------------- Have a happy GNU millennium! ----------------------   
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert    | Running GNU/Linux on Alpha,68K| Happy  \ 
\ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | MIPS,x86,ARM, SPARC and HP-PA | In Hex /
 \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org   |_______/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/