Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 11:01:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 11:01:40 -0400 Received: from outpost.ds9a.nl ([213.244.168.210]:55975 "EHLO outpost.ds9a.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 11:01:40 -0400 Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 17:07:15 +0200 From: bert hubert To: jbradford@dial.pipex.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: 2.5.x and 8250 UART problems Message-ID: <20021005150715.GA30761@outpost.ds9a.nl> Mail-Followup-To: bert hubert , jbradford@dial.pipex.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk References: <200210051506.g95F6jfL000423@darkstar.example.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200210051506.g95F6jfL000423@darkstar.example.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 948 Lines: 22 On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 04:06:45PM +0100, jbradford@dial.pipex.com wrote: > I've noticed that 8250 UART based serial port performance is poorer in > 2.5.x than 2.4.x and 2.2.x, on a couple of my machines. > > The 486 SX-20 with 4 MB RAM, running 2.2.21 reliably achieves about 650 > BPS download from another machine, with the port runnnig at 9600 bps. > With 2.5.40, many characters are lost at 9600, making, e.g. a ZModem > transfer retry for almost every block. Have you tried 'hdparm -u'? > -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services http://www.tk the dot in .tk http://lartc.org Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/