Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965438Ab3FTLei (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jun 2013 07:34:38 -0400 Received: from mail-ea0-f175.google.com ([209.85.215.175]:57369 "EHLO mail-ea0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965366Ab3FTLeg (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jun 2013 07:34:36 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:34:31 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, roland@kernel.org, kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com, penberg@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Mike Marciniszyn Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Revert pinned_vm braindamage Message-ID: <20130620113431.GA12125@gmail.com> References: <20130606124351.GZ27176@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20130613140632.15982af2ebc443b24bfff86a@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1614 Lines: 43 * Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jun 2013, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Let's try to get this wrapped up? > > > > On Thu, 6 Jun 2013 14:43:51 +0200 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > > > > Patch bc3e53f682 ("mm: distinguish between mlocked and pinned pages") > > > broke RLIMIT_MEMLOCK. > > > > I rather like what bc3e53f682 did, actually. RLIMIT_MEMLOCK limits the > > amount of memory you can mlock(). Nice and simple. > > > > This pinning thing which infiniband/perf are doing is conceptually > > different and if we care at all, perhaps we should be looking at adding > > RLIMIT_PINNED. > > Actually PINNED is just a stronger version of MEMLOCK. PINNED and > MEMLOCK are both preventing the page from being paged out. PINNED adds > the constraint of preventing minor faults as well. > > So I think the really important tuning knob is the limitation of pages > which cannot be paged out. And this is what RLIMIT_MEMLOCK is about. > > Now if you want to add RLIMIT_PINNED as well, then it only limits the > number of pages which cannot create minor faults, but that does not > affect the limitation of total pages which cannot be paged out. Agreed. ( Furthermore, the RLIMIT_MEMLOCK semantics change actively broke code so this is not academic and it would be nice to progress with it. ) Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/