Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758578Ab3FTSO5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:14:57 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:45162 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758557Ab3FTSOz (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:14:55 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 20:14:45 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Matthew Garrett Cc: James Bottomley , Ingo Molnar , Linux EFI , Matt Fleming , X86 ML , LKML , Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 0/4] EFI 1:1 mapping Message-ID: <20130620181445.GA791@pd.tnic> References: <20130620093337.GI32694@pd.tnic> <20130620094446.GA17882@srcf.ucam.org> <1371740019.2372.3.camel@dabdike> <20130620162916.GA25727@srcf.ucam.org> <1371746775.2372.11.camel@dabdike> <20130620165426.GB26214@srcf.ucam.org> <20130620170124.GA19877@pd.tnic> <20130620171210.GA26593@srcf.ucam.org> <20130620180808.GB19877@pd.tnic> <20130620181015.GA27833@srcf.ucam.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130620181015.GA27833@srcf.ucam.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 742 Lines: 20 On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 07:10:15PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Because Windows passes high addresses to SetVirtualAddressMap(), and > because if you can imagine firmware developers getting it wrong then > firmware developers will have got it wrong. Can we reversely assume that if we'd used fixed high offsets, as hpa suggests, then it'll be fine? IOW, are any high addresses, even fixed ones, fine? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/