MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <51C318D6.4090601@gmail.com>
References: <1370589652-24549-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com>
	<1370589652-24549-5-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com>
	<CAPM31RLB6nN+qN8UNq0RXiRYKaFZ6GYVP-=kZMR8-rkP9831Bw@mail.gmail.com>
	<51BF2E37.5040400@intel.com>
	<CALZhoSSweOzTgjykRMxv_kha9TH-8EAKvuhinf8ADFyFDzDTuQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALZhoSSFr_HN9ccxNLK7HA-7O9soAU7VZ3njtKf=Ndw=_AbQRw@mail.gmail.com>
	<51C318D6.4090601@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:30:37 +0800
Message-ID: <CALZhoSQgO-V-vkOy+urL_H4cjcCE8YY3w+K=mS8hptWteKGcFw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v8 4/9] sched: fix slept time double counting in enqueue entity
From: Lei Wen <adrian.wenl@gmail.com>
To: Alex Shi <seakeel@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
        Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>,
        Changlong Xie <changlongx.xie@intel.com>, sgruszka@redhat.com,
        =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Weisbecker?= <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1507
Lines: 46

Hi Alex,

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Alex Shi <seakeel@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 06/20/2013 10:46 AM, Lei Wen wrote:
>>
>>
>> But here I have a question, there is another usage of __synchronzie_entity_decay
>> in current kernel, in the switched_from_fair function.
>>
>> If task being frequently switched between rt and fair class, would it
>> also bring the
>> redundant issue? Do we need patch like below?
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> index b5408e1..9640c66 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> @@ -5856,7 +5856,7 @@ static void switched_from_fair(struct rq *rq,
>> struct task_struct *p)
>>         */
>>         if (p->se.avg.decay_count) {
>>                 struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(&p->se);
>> -               se->avg.last_runnable_update +=
>> +               p->se.avg.last_runnable_update +=
>
> what tree does this patch base on?

I create the patch based on v3.9 kernel.
If it is ok, I could create a formal one based on latest kernel.

Thanks,
Lei

>>                                 __synchronize_entity_decay(&p->se);
>>                 subtract_blocked_load_contrib(cfs_rq,
>>                                 p->se.avg.load_avg_contrib);
>
>
> --
> Thanks
>     Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/