Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:31:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:31:17 -0400 Received: from web13202.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.174.187]:49726 "HELO web13202.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:31:14 -0400 Message-ID: <20021005193650.17795.qmail@web13202.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 12:36:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Gigi Duru Subject: The end of embedded Linux? To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1144 Lines: 32 Trivial experiment: configure out _ALL_ the options on 2.5.38 and build bzImage. My result? A totally useless 270KB kernel (compressed). Now try to put in some useful stuff and the _compressed_ image will cheerfully approach 1MB. Where are the days when a 200KB kernel would be fully equipped? I know you guys are struggling to bring "world class VM & IO" to Linux, going for SMPs and other big toys, but you are about to lose what you already have: the embedded market. As an embedded developer, I can't stand bloat. I think an OS designer should feel the same, and develop in a fully modular and configurable manner, going for both speed and size. For a long time I've felt that Linux has got it right, but lately I'm not that sure anymore. Gigi Duru __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/