Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:41:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:41:18 -0400 Received: from se1.cogenit.fr ([195.68.53.173]:185 "EHLO cogenit.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:40:43 -0400 Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 21:46:13 +0200 From: Francois Romieu To: Gigi Duru Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: The end of embedded Linux? Message-ID: <20021005214613.A22346@fafner.intra.cogenit.fr> References: <20021005193650.17795.qmail@web13202.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20021005193650.17795.qmail@web13202.mail.yahoo.com>; from giduru@yahoo.com on Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 12:36:50PM -0700 X-Organisation: Marie's fan club - III Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 742 Lines: 20 Gigi Duru : [...] > As an embedded developer, I can't stand bloat. I think > an OS designer should feel the same, and develop in a > fully modular and configurable manner, going for both > speed and size. For a long time I've felt that Linux > has got it right, but lately I'm not that sure > anymore. It has been stated many times that it would be nice to have an option dedicated to devices with few memory (no big hashes etc.). You know what you have to do :o) -- Ueimor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/