Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 16:47:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 16:47:11 -0400 Received: from web13201.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.174.186]:64267 "HELO web13201.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 16:47:10 -0400 Message-ID: <20021005205238.47023.qmail@web13201.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 13:52:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Gigi Duru Subject: Re: The end of embedded Linux? To: Andre Hedrick Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2159 Lines: 68 Now thats some advice from a kernel hacker... You really don't seem to care too much about embedded, do you? It's not about what I do not do, it's about what YOU do (I'm not talking to you personally, but to the hacker community as a whole). The kernel core didn't jump to 270KB compressed because I didn't do something. Let me reformulate for you: * some years ago, (2.2 era) I was more than happy about embedding Linux. * along came 2.4, and things got fuzzy (should we move on, or stick to the good ol' stuff?) * now, 2.6 (or whatever) seems like a very bad choice for us. * I wonder about the next one (2.8/whatever): will it require a mainframe to run? It's the trend, you see: you were on the right track but now you're loosing it. From the embedded point of view, YOU ARE GOING THE WRONG DIRECTION. And don't give me the "use 2.2" advice. Stuff is being back-ported, I know, but not all of it. Why are old versions being actively maintained anyway? Isn't that a realization that those old versions are better suited for some tasks than the new one? Why would anyone choose to use 2.2? Because it serves him better. Now, why is 2.2 serving someone better than 2.4? That's something I'd like you to answer... The beauty of Linux was it's scalability (I'm not talking SMP here): you had the same kernel running on the appliance, on the PC and on that mainframe. Things were smooth, things were perfect. I would have loved to preserve that... Regards, Gigi --- Andre Hedrick wrote: > > Well have a nice day and go pay for windriver > licenses, or use the source > to adopt to your needs, or hire somebody who can do > it for you. > Whinning will not help, doing will. > > Regards, > > Andre Hedrick > LAD Storage Consulting Group > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/