Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758303Ab3FVMF7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jun 2013 08:05:59 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:36658 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756024Ab3FVMF6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jun 2013 08:05:58 -0400 Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 22:03:04 +1000 From: David Gibson To: Alex Williamson Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Alexander Graf , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras , "kvm@vger.kernel.org mailing list" , open list , kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell , Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: PPC: Add support for IOMMU in-kernel handling Message-ID: <20130622120304.GB25265@voom.fritz.box> References: <87txkun568.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <1371617970.21896.232.camel@pasglop> <1371653443.21896.291.camel@pasglop> <1371656989.22659.98.camel@ul30vt.home> <51C28BEA.8050501@ozlabs.ru> <20130620052822.GB3140@voom.redhat.com> <1371714449.3944.14.camel@pasglop> <51C2C1CC.9000003@ozlabs.ru> <1371740113.32709.22.camel@ul30vt.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1371740113.32709.22.camel@ul30vt.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2584 Lines: 68 --LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 08:55:13AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 18:48 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > > On 06/20/2013 05:47 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 15:28 +1000, David Gibson wrote: > > >>> Just out of curiosity - would not get_file() and fput_atomic() on a > > >> group's > > >>> file* do the right job instead of vfio_group_add_external_user() and > > >>> vfio_group_del_external_user()? > > >> > > >> I was thinking that too. Grabbing a file reference would certainly = be > > >> the usual way of handling this sort of thing. > > >=20 > > > But that wouldn't prevent the group ownership to be returned to > > > the kernel or another user would it ? > >=20 > >=20 > > Holding the file pointer does not let the group->container_users counte= r go > > to zero >=20 > How so? Holding the file pointer means the file won't go away, which > means the group release function won't be called. That means the group > won't go away, but that doesn't mean it's attached to an IOMMU. A user > could call UNSET_CONTAINER. Uhh... *thinks*. Ah, I see. I think the interface should not take the group fd, but the container fd. Holding a reference to *that* would keep the necessary things around. But more to the point, it's the right thing semantically: The container is essentially the handle on a host iommu address space, and so that's what should be bound by the KVM call to a particular guest iommu address space. e.g. it would make no sense to bind two different groups to different guest iommu address spaces, if they were in the same container - the guest thinks they are different spaces, but if they're in the same container they must be the same space. --=20 David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson --LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlHFkngACgkQaILKxv3ab8Y3+wCfQb5uscPEtj1cWB5jyIrMtx8E oU8AnRKwvUpowC3jDzVnLa/1IjqF9OWM =s2Y0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/