Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 20:47:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 20:47:55 -0400 Received: from 2-225.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.193.160.225]:215 "EHLO 2-225.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 20:47:53 -0400 Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 21:53:17 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Ben Collins cc: Larry McVoy , Subject: Re: New BK License Problem? In-Reply-To: <20021006003217.GD585@phunnypharm.org> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 886 Lines: 25 On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Ben Collins wrote: > > ftp://nl.linux.org/pub/linux/bk2patch/ > > Oh, but that may be useless, unless you regenerate your patches whenever > the tree is reparented. I ran into this while trying to do the same > thing. Basing it on the ChangeSet ID is a waste, and it needs to be > based on the ChangeSet key instead (the ChangeSet ID for a given key can > change when a merge is done). Good point. I'll need to look at this more closely... Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Spamtraps of the month: september@surriel.com trac@trac.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/