Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S263116AbSJFAnA>; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 20:43:00 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S263120AbSJFAnA>; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 20:43:00 -0400
Received: from 2-225.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.193.160.225]:19925 "EHLO
	2-225.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S263116AbSJFAm6>; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 20:42:58 -0400
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 21:48:25 -0300 (BRT)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com
To: "Murray J. Root" <murrayr@brain.org>
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New BK License Problem?
In-Reply-To: <20021005225310.GA10667@Master.Wizards>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0210052147150.22735-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org
X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 919
Lines: 27

On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Murray J. Root wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 05:10:33PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:

> > Seems like a pretty straightforward violation of the anti-trust laws,

> Worse - it's also illegal to refuse to do business with someone
> based on who their employer is, in most states.

Bitkeeper isn't refusing business. They just refuse to give away
their product for free to competitors, but these competitors can
still ask Bitkeeper for the normal commercial license ...

regards,

Rik
-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

http://www.surriel.com/		http://distro.conectiva.com/

Spamtraps of the month:  september@surriel.com trac@trac.org

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/