Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 20:39:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 20:39:59 -0400 Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:28038 "EHLO mail.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 20:39:58 -0400 Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 17:45:32 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: Rik van Riel Cc: Ulrich Drepper , Ben Collins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Larry McVoy Subject: Re: New BK License Problem? Message-ID: <20021005174532.K12580@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , Rik van Riel , Ulrich Drepper , Ben Collins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Larry McVoy References: <3D9F3C5C.1050708@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from riel@conectiva.com.br on Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 09:34:18PM -0300 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 908 Lines: 20 > Good question, does Larry have any objections to people > exporting stuff from bitkeeper as patches and making those > patches available for download ? ;) > > I'm pretty sure he doesn't, since Linus and Marcelo are > doing exactly this. Right. I'd make a fuss if it were someone who was also working on Subversion, yeah, for the obvious reasons. That's why that clause is in there. On the other hand, if Ben was ftping all the csets from your machine and shoving them into Subversion there isn't a darn thing I can do about it, it's not my data. So you're fine. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/