Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 07:07:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 07:07:47 -0400 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:26296 "HELO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 07:07:46 -0400 Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 13:24:25 +0200 (CEST) From: Ingo Molnar Reply-To: Ingo Molnar To: "David S. Miller" Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, , , , , Subject: Re: New BK License Problem? In-Reply-To: <20021006.035722.68159471.davem@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1048 Lines: 28 On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, David S. Miller wrote: > Larry talked about some sort of > guarantees that involve GPL-ing of BK code 1-2 years after it's first > used by the kernel, to make sure the Linux kernel tree is not left > in limbo. > > Ingo, he promised this if the bitkeeper logging went down for a period > of time or if bitkeeper were to go out of buisness. yes, i know. > He did not promise this just because we use it for kernel development > for 1-2 years, are you out of your mind? :-) actually, this discussion dates back many years, and i definitely remember an Alladin-soft -alike license being considered in where the GPL-ing of the infrastructure would be delayed by 1-2 years to give Larry a competitive advantage, but the potential damage to Linux would be limited. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/