Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 07:53:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 07:53:11 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:29069 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 07:53:10 -0400 Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 04:52:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20021006.045201.26534685.davem@redhat.com> To: mingo@elte.hu Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, lm@bitmover.com, drepper@redhat.com, bcollins@debian.org, torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BK MetaData License Problem? From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: References: <20021006.035934.106436540.davem@redhat.com> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 976 Lines: 21 From: Ingo Molnar Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 14:04:42 +0200 (CEST) It's not a big problem today because if you ask me then i'll tell you that it's GPL-ed - but what will be the situation be in years? Couldnt 'BitMover or any other operator of an Open Logging server' argue that the MetaData is owned by whoever created them, and is not covered by the GPL - and only 'BitMover or any other operator of an Open Logging server' has 'permission to republish the Metadata'. Anything you write is automatically copyrighted by you, even if you don't specifically state it as such. That is my basic understanding of copyright law. BitMover et al. can't take your copyright powers away from you. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/