Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 08:18:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 08:18:47 -0400 Received: from vladimir.pegasys.ws ([64.220.160.58]:40714 "HELO vladimir.pegasys.ws") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 08:18:46 -0400 Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 05:24:15 -0700 From: jw schultz To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Unable to kill processes in D-state Message-ID: <20021006122415.GE31878@pegasys.ws> Mail-Followup-To: jw schultz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20021005090705.GA18475@stud.ntnu.no> <1033841462.1247.3716.camel@phantasy> <20021005182740.GC16200@vagabond> <20021005235614.GC25827@stud.ntnu.no> <20021006021802.GA31878@pegasys.ws> <1033871869.1247.4397.camel@phantasy> <20021006024902.GB31878@pegasys.ws> <20021006105917.GB13046@stud.ntnu.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20021006105917.GB13046@stud.ntnu.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1516 Lines: 34 On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 12:59:17PM +0200, Thomas Lang?s wrote: > jw schultz: > > I stand corrected. The load average reported will reflect > > them. The D-state processes, however, will have nearly zero > > effect on the system performance, yes? So in this case the > > load average reported is simply an infated number. > > They won't have any effect on the system, but the load number is > insane (we have a 2 CPU intel-boks with a load number of 480) > and there's like 200-300 (or more) processes hanging in D-state > with they're FD's and stuff. There _really_ should be a way > to remove all theese processes, Solaris does this nicely. That you have that many processes hanging in the D-state is a concern. That the load number is inflated is telling you something is wrong. If not then the logic feeding the load number needs changing. Are all those processes hanging because of NFS? If so, i'd start by looking at the mount options as i said before. I'd also look into the network and fileserver because something is wrong. In my experience Solaris behaved the same way. -- ________________________________________________________________ J.W. Schultz Pegasystems Technologies email address: jw@pegasys.ws Remember Cernan and Schmitt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/