Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752681Ab3FYPVp (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:21:45 -0400 Received: from iolanthe.rowland.org ([192.131.102.54]:45056 "HELO iolanthe.rowland.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752659Ab3FYPVo (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:21:44 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:21:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Alan Stern X-X-Sender: stern@iolanthe.rowland.org To: Greg KH cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Subject: Re: USB tree now closed for 3.11 In-Reply-To: <20130625150732.GA19676@kroah.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1116 Lines: 28 On Tue, 25 Jun 2013, Greg KH wrote: > Hi all, > > With the release of the 3.10-rc7 kernel, I think it's time to close the > USB tree for new features / cleanups for 3.11. So I'm closing my > tree, and will only be applying obvious bugfixes or regressions to it > until 3.11-rc1 comes out. > > You can keep sending me patches for the tree that don't fit the "bugfix" > category, but note that I'll be storing them away to wait for 3.11-rc1 > comes out, which might be a few weeks, so please be patient. > > The USB tree right now contains 382 patches, and the diffstat > summary is: > 410 files changed, 18183 insertions(+), 4956 deletions(-) Instead of storing away new patches where people can't easily get at them, you could create a temporary branch to hold them until 3.11-rc1 is released. Would that involve a significant amount of extra work? Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/