From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
        Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, john.ronciak@intel.com,
        miles.j.penner@intel.com, bruce.w.allan@intel.com,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75Vfw5WO+6+_NB1mbgma7KVo-b7pyr6XA=LM1ozg580kbrg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1372177330-28013-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
 <1372177330-28013-4-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
 <CAHp75Vfw5WO+6+_NB1mbgma7KVo-b7pyr6XA=LM1ozg580kbrg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] PCI: introduce pci_trim_stale_devices()
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20130625175625.3F434E0090@blue.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 20:56:25 +0300 (EEST)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1654
Lines: 48

Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Mika Westerberg
> <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > The new function stops and removes the device if it doesn't respond.
> > If the device responds and it's a bus we apply the function to all
> > subdevices recursively.
> >
> > It's useful for hotplug bus check case, when you need drop all unplugged
> > devices before looking for new ones.
> 
> One comment below.
> 
> > +void pci_trim_stale_devices(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > +{
> > +       struct pci_bus *bus = dev->subordinate;
> > +       struct pci_dev *child, *tmp;
> > +       bool alive;
> > +       u32 l;
> > +
> > +       /* check if the device responds */
> > +       alive = pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id(dev->bus, dev->devfn, &l, 0);
> > +       if (!alive)
> > +               pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(dev);
> > +
> > +       if (alive && bus)
> > +               list_for_each_entry_safe(child, tmp, &bus->devices, bus_list)
> > +                       pci_trim_stale_devices(child);
> 
> It's not a tail call anyway, so, what about
> 
>    if (!pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id(dev->bus, dev->devfn, &l, 0)) {
>              pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(dev);
>    } else if (bus) {
>              list_for_each_entry_safe(child, tmp, &bus->devices, bus_list)
>                      pci_trim_stale_devices(child);
>    }

Why? It looks uglier.


-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/