Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 11:30:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 11:30:37 -0400 Received: from mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.1.48]:34729 "EHLO Mail.ZEDAT.FU-Berlin.DE") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 11:30:37 -0400 Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Oliver Neukum To: "Martin J. Bligh" , Andrew Morton , Rob Landley Subject: Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA)) Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 17:14:31 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1281002684.1033892373@[10.10.2.3]> In-Reply-To: <1281002684.1033892373@[10.10.2.3]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 845 Lines: 20 On Sunday 06 October 2002 17:19, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > > Then there's the issue of application startup. There's not enough > > read ahead. This is especially sad, as the order of page faults is > > at least partially predictable. > > Is the problem really, fundamentally a lack of readahead in the > kernel? Or is it that your application is huge bloated pig? > With admittedly no evidence whatsoever, I suspect the latter is > really the root cause of this type of problem. Of course, but that's not an excuse for sucking more than necessary. Application startup is a problem. Regards Oliver - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/