Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 12:22:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 12:21:32 -0400 Received: from dbl.q-ag.de ([80.146.160.66]:60803 "EHLO dbl.q-ag.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 12:20:48 -0400 Message-ID: <3DA0642A.1070706@colorfullife.com> Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 18:26:18 +0200 From: Manfred Spraul User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 4.0) X-Accept-Language: en, de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: grendel@debian.org CC: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Larry McVoy , "David S. Miller" , Linus Torvalds , Russell King Subject: Re: BK MetaData License Problem? References: <3DA02F30.8040904@colorfullife.com> <20021006154806.GA2524@thanes.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1544 Lines: 41 Russel King wrote: > > Therefore, I'd stronlg advise people in the EU not to use BK's > BK_USER/BK_HOST feature when importing patches. > I think the user info is not critical: according to the GPL, you must tag your changes with date+name. By making a patch, you have agreed to the GPL terms, which means you have agreed that your name will be used together with the change. I think the copyright laws require that, too. But the GPL doesn't mandate a changelog... Marek Habersack wrote: > > Perhaps I am being silly at the moment, but wouldn't it suffice in this case > to put a statement in your commit message (I believe it can be automated) > stating that this message and the comitted data are licensed under the GPL? > For example. Or a sentence in the Licensing file, or whatever.("If you want to contribute to the development at www.kernel.org, then you must agree to the following conditions: You name will be used, your commit text will be used, your mail address will be published etc." No GPL conflict, you are free to fork) I agree with Ingo that there is the danger that without anything, it might happen that we'd have to throw away the changelogs [or that express permission for all existing entries will be needed, which is more or less equivalent] -- Manfred - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/