Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 13:30:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 13:29:35 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust51.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.51]:31730 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 13:28:14 -0400 Subject: Re: BK MetaData License Problem? From: Alan Cox To: Jes Sorensen Cc: Russell King , Ingo Molnar , "David S. Miller" , Larry McVoy , Ulrich Drepper , bcollins@debian.org, Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: <20021006.035934.106436540.davem@redhat.com> <20021006144821.B31147@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 06 Oct 2002 18:41:47 +0100 Message-Id: <1033926107.21282.42.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 963 Lines: 19 On Sun, 2002-10-06 at 18:17, Jes Sorensen wrote: > This whole metadata discussion leads me to another question which has > been bothering me about BK's 'Open' Logging and hosted trees for a > while. What is happening to all the infomation that BitMover is (or > could gather) from people accessing the Open Logging site as well as > the hosted repositories? There could be a lot of marketing value in > this if BM decided to abuse it. Ie. some marketing manager could > decide to run advertisement campaigns listing names of known > individuals using the software. They can do that anyway. The metadata is public. Nobody even needs to bother Larry about it, any more than folks who trawl it for spam email targets do - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/