Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 14:34:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 14:34:04 -0400 Received: from smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.137]:26384 "EHLO smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 14:34:03 -0400 Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 20:39:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@serv To: Larry McVoy cc: Troy Benjegerdes , Hans Reiser , walt , Subject: Re: New BK License Problem? In-Reply-To: <20021006105821.L29486@work.bitmover.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 986 Lines: 24 Hi, On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Larry McVoy wrote: > Another way to say it is "don't bite the hand that feeds you". We work > hard to help the kernel team, we make the decisions we make based on the > premise that we have to be healthy to continue to help the kernel team as > well as our other users, and it's disheartening to get yelled it for it. You get what you asked for, promoting a nonfree product in a free environment will never be fun. Can we all stop the whining now? Everyone using nonfree software should know, that he can get screwed. BK won't be the only (distributed) source management system forever and if there should be any interoperability problems caused by BK, Linus has hopefully a good filter on his inbox. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/