Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:42:43 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>, Dave Chiluk <chiluk@canonical.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Scheduler accounting inflated for io bound processes.
Message-ID: <20130626104243.GE28407@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <51C35C05.1070005@canonical.com>
 <1372176104.7497.86.camel@marge.simpson.net>
 <1372182534.7497.129.camel@marge.simpson.net>
 <20130626093713.GA27385@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130626093713.GA27385@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 540
Lines: 11

On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:37:13AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Would be very nice to randomize the sampling rate, by randomizing the 
> intervals within a 1% range or so - perf tooling will probably recognize 
> the different weights.

You're suggesting adding noise to the regular kernel tick?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/