Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 15:05:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 15:05:46 -0400 Received: from grendel.firewall.com ([66.28.56.41]:41657 "EHLO grendel.firewall.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 15:05:44 -0400 Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 21:11:13 +0200 From: Marek Habersack To: Manfred Spraul Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Larry McVoy , "David S. Miller" , Linus Torvalds , Russell King Subject: Re: BK MetaData License Problem? Message-ID: <20021006191113.GA4151@thanes.org> References: <3DA02F30.8040904@colorfullife.com> <20021006154806.GA2524@thanes.org> <3DA0642A.1070706@colorfullife.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DA0642A.1070706@colorfullife.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: I just... X-GPG-Fingerprint: 0F0B 21EE 7145 AA2A 3BF6 6D29 AB7F 74F4 621F E6EA X-message-flag: Outlook - A program to spread viri, but it can do mail too. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2559 Lines: 64 --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 06:26:18PM +0200, Manfred Spraul scribbled: [snip]=20 > Marek Habersack wrote: > > > >Perhaps I am being silly at the moment, but wouldn't it suffice in this= =20 > >case > >to put a statement in your commit message (I believe it can be automated) > >stating that this message and the comitted data are licensed under the G= PL? > > >=20 > For example. > Or a sentence in the Licensing file, or whatever.("If you want to=20 > contribute to the development at www.kernel.org, then you must agree to= =20 > the following conditions: You name will be used, your commit text will=20 > be used, your mail address will be published etc." No GPL conflict, you > are free to fork) I don't think that would suffice in this case. The problem is not in your or anybody else's consent to the terms of GPL, but that the BK license doesn't make it clear (as I understand) as to what is the legal status of the metadata - i.e. what's the license that pertains to it. Also, this is not BitMover's problem actually - thus the user, developer, would have to take care to make a clear statement as to what the changelog license is. Or, perhaps, BitMover could add to the license that the any software (i.e. source code, documentation, log messages etc.) are accepted under the same license as the, say, whole repository for the software unless otherwise stated. Then only one file in the repository would suffice to make the situation clear - it might be even done in a way that the bk tools display the contents of this file (let's call it a "banner") once per "session" (by default, of course) - to ascertain that anybody using the repository will (or may) see the contents of the file. Maybe I'm rambling :), but that looks like a sane solution to me (not being the BK user and not even liking it, I don't know whether such a "motd" file is possible). regards, marek --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9oIrRq3909GIf5uoRAh1kAJ9YpR9KeAlvRytEPLApZwy+o916YACeNAF0 OYUk1MaAdOp2E/h5QUanB4E= =FoXM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/