Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753168Ab3FZXGd (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jun 2013 19:06:33 -0400 Received: from outbound-mail03.westnet.com.au ([203.10.1.244]:36358 "EHLO outbound-mail03.westnet.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752470Ab3FZXGb (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jun 2013 19:06:31 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBADdzy1HYNY97/2dsb2JhbAANTocJu36BGoMXAQEBBCMPAQVAARALGAICBRYLAgIJAwIBAgFFBg0BBQIBAa9sc5E7gSaOJQeCT4EUA6wt X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,947,1363104000"; d="scan'208";a="346268800" X-WN-REMOTEIP: 216.53.143.123 X-WN-ENVELOPESENDER: gerg@uclinux.org X-WN-MID: 346268800 X-WN-SMTPAUTHID: gregungerer@westnet.com.au Message-ID: <51CB73E3.9000309@uclinux.org> Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 09:06:11 +1000 From: Greg Ungerer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Geert Uytterhoeven CC: Guenter Roeck , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ 00/17] 3.0.84-stable review References: <20130625183915.443950649@linuxfoundation.org> <20130625192300.GA10427@roeck-us.net> <20130625193951.GF15184@roeck-us.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2172 Lines: 56 On 26/06/13 17:34, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 09:32:26PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>> Hi Günther, >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>> Build m68k:defconfig passed >>>> Build m68k:apollo_defconfig passed >>>> Build m68k:m5272c3_defconfig failed >>>> Build m68k:m5307c3_defconfig failed >>>> Build m68k:m5249evb_defconfig failed >>>> Build m68k:m5407c3_defconfig failed >>>> Build m68k:mac_defconfig passed >>>> Build m68k:multi_defconfig passed >>>> Build m68k:sun3_defconfig passed >>>> Build m68k:sun3x_defconfig passed >>>> Build m68k:mvme16x_defconfig passed >>>> Build m68k:hp300_defconfig passed >>> >>> m68k:defconfig is an alias for m68k:multi_defconfig, so you can drop >>> one of them. >>> >>> Furthermore, m68k:multi_defconfig is the union of all m68k "classic MMU" >>> defconfigs, except for sun3_defconfig (due to the incompatible MMU type). >>> Hence dropping apollo_defconfig, mac_defconfig, sun3x_defconfig, >>> mvme16x_defconfig, and hp300_defconfig would reduce your build coverage >>> only marginally. Of course, if you have too many spare cycles ;-) >>> >> Thanks, I'll do that. The complete build for three releases takes 15+ hours >> with i7-3700k, so reducing that a bit doesn't hurt. > > FYI, you still built m68k:mvme16x_defconfig for v3.9.7-95-g6a2f14b. > >> Would there be any useful builds to add ? > > You could add m68k:m5475evb_defconfig, which is the only Coldfire > defconfig with MMU=y. > > Greg: Any other advice for Coldfire? I might have some, except I am not sure what we are talking about. I don't have enough context from the above alone :-) I take it this is test building 3.0.84? I haven't built a 3.0.x for a while, so not sure why the above ColdFire targets are failing without going and trying it out. Regards Greg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/