Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 18:40:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 18:40:32 -0400 Received: from mail.cyberus.ca ([216.191.240.111]:34007 "EHLO cyberus.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 18:40:30 -0400 Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 18:38:32 -0400 (EDT) From: jamal To: Andre Hedrick cc: Ben Greear , linux-kernel , "'netdev@oss.sgi.com'" Subject: Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 812 Lines: 28 On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Andre Hedrick wrote: > > I have a pair of Compaq e1000's which have never overheated, and I use > them for heavy duty iSCSI testing and designing of drivers. These are > massive 66/64 cards but still nothing like what you are reporting. > > I will look some more at the issue soon. > It seems like the prerequisite to reproduce it is you beat the NIC heavily with a lot of packets/sec and then run it at that sustained rate for at least 30 minutes. isci would tend to use MTU sized packets which will not be that effective. cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/