Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 18:43:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 18:43:45 -0400 Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:7570 "EHLO mail.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 18:43:44 -0400 Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 15:49:18 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: Jes Sorensen Cc: Alan Cox , Russell King , Ingo Molnar , "David S. Miller" , Larry McVoy , Ulrich Drepper , bcollins@debian.org, Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: BK MetaData License Problem? Message-ID: <20021006154918.X29486@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , Jes Sorensen , Alan Cox , Russell King , Ingo Molnar , "David S. Miller" , Larry McVoy , Ulrich Drepper , bcollins@debian.org, Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <20021006.035934.106436540.davem@redhat.com> <20021006144821.B31147@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <1033926107.21282.42.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from jes@wildopensource.com on Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 01:45:04PM -0400 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1924 Lines: 37 On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 01:45:04PM -0400, Jes Sorensen wrote: > I have no issue with a company like BM or anyone else using anonymous > statistics for advertisement, but I'd be royally pissed if I had my > name on someone's leaflet without having given my written permission > first. Hence the suggestion for a privacy clause in the license. OK, so find some legal language that does what you want and send it to me. If it doesn't prevent the openlogging web pages or the bkbits.net web pages and bkd ports, we'll add it. We don't do a darn thing with that info, I hear, understand, and agree with your concern, I just need some sample language that threads the needle. All the language I've seen would prevent us from displaying the web pages. That's no good. We can't say we won't redistribute because the web pages are definitely redistribution. We can say we won't sell it if that helps. If we say we can't aggragate it then we can't do stuff like this: http://www.bitkeeper.com/stats/linux-csets-L3W.png which is something we'd like to make part of bkbits.net. And I think it's something that the community wants. So what's the language that says we won't do the spam style crud that you are legitimately afraid of but does allow the useful stuff for the community? It's good to handle this now, if we can get it nailed down to something reasonable it's hard for BitMover the corporation to lose its mind and change things later, you can argue fair use or breach of promise or one of those lovely legal terms, I don't remember which covers this, but I know there is one. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/