Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753837Ab3F0OiK (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:38:10 -0400 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:60380 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752067Ab3F0OiI (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:38:08 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:38:01 +0100 From: Matthew Garrett To: Leif Lindholm Cc: James Bottomley , Matt Fleming , Grant Likely , Stephen Warren , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "patches@linaro.org" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , matt.fleming@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Documentation: arm: [U]EFI runtime services Message-ID: <20130627143801.GB12900@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1372183863-11333-1-git-send-email-leif.lindholm@linaro.org> <1372183863-11333-2-git-send-email-leif.lindholm@linaro.org> <51CA2B03.4080106@wwwdotorg.org> <20130626135311.GA9078@rocoto.smurfnet.nu> <20130626135933.GQ22026@console-pimps.org> <1372257499.2168.5.camel@dabdike> <20130627013219.GA346@srcf.ucam.org> <20130627090050.GC18151@rocoto.smurfnet.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130627090050.GC18151@rocoto.smurfnet.nu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@cavan.codon.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cavan.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1035 Lines: 22 On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:00:50AM +0200, Leif Lindholm wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 02:32:19AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > We can probably get away with that now, but it does risk us ending up > > with some firmware that expects to run in physical mode (boards designed > > for Linux) and some firmware that expects to run in virtual mode (boards > > designed for Windows). The degree of lockdown in the Windows ecosystem > > at present means it's not a real problem at the moment, but if that ever > > changes we're going to risk incompatibility. > > Is there anything preventing calling SetVirtualAddressMap() with a > 1:1 map? No, but we've seen bugs as a result on some x86 systems. As far as the spec, though, you're fine. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/